Fascinating history of the most reviled humans in recent history.
Even if it isn’t true, which I think it is, it should never be censored and its teller imprisoned.
In Episode 148, David Crowe speaks with David Smith of the UK charities Genital Autonomy and 15 Square. The conversation covers male genital mutilation (circumcision), female genital mutilation (FGM) and transgender changes of minors. They cover the reasons why circumcision still exists and why it is so much less common in the UK than in the US. They discuss the purpose of the foreskin and what harms occur from its removal. Circumcision is contrasted with FGM, where the autonomy of the child is
* Duration: 57:52
* Published: 2017-07-19 9:46:30 AM
* Episode Download Link (79 MB): infectiousmyth.podbean.com/mf/feed/c3waks/TIM_071817.mp3
* Show Notes: infectiousmyth.podbean.com/e/the-infectious-myth-david-smith-on-genital-autonomy-071917/
* Episode Feed: The Infectious Myth – infectiousmyth.podbean.com/feed/
Besides destroying Iraq so it can be rebuilt in the West’s image, one goal was to bring many immigrants (many highly skilled) to America.
Miles Mathis is a liberal – in the traditional sense of the word. Link.
I agree with all of that, which is why I am a liberal. Originally, equality meant “equal under the law”.
It has to do with equal rights. It doesn’t imply everyone has equal abilities, or should be given equal
consideration on every issue—even issues they know nothing about. It implies that normal people
shouldn’t be lied to and preyed upon by rich people, and that therefore normal people should be treated
with equal consideration in matters of law, education, finance, health, and so on. That is, public
matters, not private matters. It is simply a fairness doctrine. Same with gender equality. It didn’t
originally mean that the sexes should be indistinguishable. It meant that one sex shouldn’t be able to
prey on the other one in any arena. It meant that women should be equal under the law. That’s what all
the other issues are about as well, including freedom of speech, freedom of the press, unions and so on.
Without those things, it is too easy for the rich to monopolize society, raking everything into their
However, as I have shown you, the rich have found a way around all that. One way they have found a
way around it is by twisting the passage above, making you think liberalism is something it is not.
People like Alex Jones, Mike Adams, the Germ, and thousands of others have been drumming into your
head the idea that the collapse of Modern society is the fault of liberals, and of the idea of liberalism.
They want you to think that all the worst aspects of our culture came from the promotion of liberalism.
But just the opposite is true. As we have seen in my papers of the past five years or so, real liberals
didn’t create any of these movements—including Modern art, what now passes for feminism, gender
chaos, or any of the rest. They were all top-down projects of Intel, usually coming out of the military,
and financed by the big capitalists—most of them Jewish. I didn’t know that a few years ago, and
honestly didn’t want to know it, but there it is. I am honest enough to admit the truth when it hits me in
the face. I did my own research from the ground up, and that research took me to the same culprits
This means that liberalism has been blackwashed on purpose. It has been blackwashed just like
republicanism was before it, and for the same reason. Both liberalism and republicanism are antifascist.
They promote the rights of the lower and middle classes not to be preyed on by the rich. But,
as we have seen, the rich have been infiltating and blackwashing republicanism for centuries. That is
what Marxism was all about. Marx was from Jewish industrialist families, and he was nothing more
than a mole into the republican camps, blowing them from the inside. It is the same with liberalism,
which has been blown both from the outside and from the inside, via the long telling of fantastic lies by
thousands of paid agents.
Another way the rich have undercut liberalism is by allowing things like free speech and freedom of
the press, while gutting them of all real meaning. In theory, we have freedom of the press in the US,
since the military is not actively shutting down major media at gunpoint. In reality, the press is not free
at all, since it is completely owned by the rich. That is the neo-fascist answer to the press: not to
forcibly control it, but to financially control it. In our society, the media is managed, which makes it
utterly useless as a tool of liberalism.
Beyond that, an owned and managed media can be used to flip the world on you, making you think
things exist at A when they really exist at Z. They have convinced you the US is suffering from
liberalism, and that therefore we need to move right. When the truth is, the US isn’t liberal at all, by the
definition above. The country is tightly controlled from the top down, your freedoms are illusory, and
all the events you see in the news are manufactured to keep you from the truth. Which means—by the
old real definitions of words—we need to move sharp left. Basically, “right” means the rich control
everything and have all the advantages; “left” means normal people have an eq